New Zealand Principal Magazine

“Learner Agency” – is it really as simple as all that?

Jennifer Charteris & Dianne Smardon · 2017 Term 3 September Issue · Research

‘Learner agency’ – Is it really as simple as all that?

Jennifer Charteris

Dianne Smardon

Jennifer Charteris and Dianne Smardon 

University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia

Whether you are in a school that is retaining single cell spaces, have remodelled, or purpose built an innovative learning environment, student ‘agency’ has gained traction as a ‘buzzword’. The notions of the 21st century learner, the use of mobile technologies, and innovative schooling design are influences that, when taken together, have led to a focus on relationships in classroom spaces. There is a spotlight on learner agency. What do we mean by learner agency? Is the model of the self-directed/ self-managing/ self-regulated learner with ‘choice and voice’ really the go? This is the view of agency where the learner knows the assessment for learning recipe, can follow teacher instruction, and is compliant with classroom norms and protocols. In this article we share a typology of agency we have developed through our research with Aotearoa principals (Charteris & Smardon, 2017). Agency can be thought about in different ways, as our typology indicates, and these differences have implications for teaching and learning. (See Table 1.)

We identify four forms of agency that can be seen in Aotearoa classrooms – sovereign, relational, ecological and new material. Firstly, there is agency associated with the sovereign self, an autonomous learner that has emerged from self-determination theory. We found that this was the most common interpretation of agency among the 38 Aotearoa school leaders in our case study. Typified by ‘choice and voice’, this account of agency privileges ‘empowerment’, and ‘student responsibility’, with little consideration given to socio-cultural factors and power relations in the learning environment. (This is elaborated below.) Secondly, there is relational agency – produced through sociocultural influences. Relational agency addresses ones’ capability to work with peers to ‘strengthen purposeful responses to complex problems’ (Edwards, 2011, p. 34). It involves interaction with others’ understandings and the integration of others’ perspectives into one’s decision making. Children work with their peers, understanding both the motives of others and the resources that together they bring to a shared task. We see relational agency in classes where teachers promote a lot of dialogue. Thirdly, we have ecological agency, which is a temporally embedded (time related) process of social engagement, where young people shape their actions in response to their learning contexts. This is where what we bring from the past, connects with the sociocultural resources in the present, and can be projected as a capacity to act in the future. In ecological terms, agency is built on past achievements, understandings and patterns of action with both short and long term considerations. As Priestley and colleagues point out (2012), ecological agency ‘varies from context to context based upon certain environmental conditions of possibility and constraint’ (p. 2). The beliefs, values and attributes that students mobilise in particular situations are important. Engagement with this sort of agency requires us to think about the children’s histories. How do beliefs, values and attributes generated in the past, influence students use of materials, involvement with people and approaches taken to learning in the circumstances of their current classroom? How can they be equipped emotionally, socially, culturally and physically to take future action as agentic learners in particular learning contexts? Ecological agency is located learning, at a point in time that feeds into a future purpose.

Table 1. A typology of agency Agency

Functional definitions

Associated Theories

Sovereign

Individual students can be provided opportunities by teachers to exert agency. It is possible to possess it. It is enacted through choice. It is intrinsic.

Cognitivism, Mindsets Self-determination theory

Relational

Relational agency is co-produced in spaces between people. It is dialogic and socially produced and consequentially is a dynamic that resides in social environments. It is therefore situational; located in the dynamic between extrinsic and intrinsic elements.

Socio-cultural theory

Ecological

Agency is a temporally embedded process of social engagement that is informed by the past, oriented to the future and enacted in the present.

Socio-cultural theory

New material

Agency is always in flux and flow – generated through a range of elements within schooling spaces. It is co-produced in relations, between humans and objects, and between humans.

New material theory

(Adapted from Charteris & Smardon, 2017 p. 6)

Finally, there is an emerging recognition that objects are measuring of their submission to what amounts to little more agentic and influence classroom spaces. As an example, ILE than coercive operations of power’ (McPherson & Saltmarsh, have the potential to support flexible pedagogy and prompt 2016, p.6). Student individuality and competitiveness is a rethinking of learner agency. We see the affordances of privileged, with each learner shaped as an economic unit and objects in learning spaces, influencing the sorts of learning objectified to meet the demands of a market economy. taking place – e.g. flexible furniture/moving walls influencing In the classroom, sovereign agency involves a relatively simplistic possibilities for individual, peer to peer, or group learning. In conception of power relations. Power is seen as a possession, another example, acoustics in poorly that teachers can deploy, give away, designed spaces negatively impact on We have heard of ‘ILE or take back. For example, we have student learning (and possibly teacher seen curriculum support materials nerves). Further, the agency of the refugees’, where teachers describing agency as ‘ownership’. This objects and structures in classroom a controlling stance, where agency have left schools because of isis something environments can prompt resistance that teachers can impart to ILE spaces. We have heard of ‘ILE redesigned spaces. to students, a form of empowerment refugees’, where teachers have left and responsibilisation. Subtleties of schools because of redesigned spaces. Objects are influential in resistance are ignored or negated and certainly not seen as a relationships. demonstration of agency. Furthermore, when agency is seen as responsibilisation, the Is there a problem with sovereign agency? onus is on learners to accept responsibility for themselves and Learner agency is seen as conducive to 21st century learning and participate in acts of self-surveillance and control. Student choice the evolving pedagogy of ILE. Yet the notion, if unquestioned, becomes a ‘forced choice,’ as there are few options really but is problematic. Just as student voice becomes merely a ‘quality to conform, where the ‘chosen' line of action is really the only control’ manoeuvre, aligned with neoliberal moves to leverage possible action (Davies, 2000). school improvement, agency can be located in the same way. Agency is fraudulent when there is only a limited role for Sovereign agency is based on ‘individuals’ freedom of students to be significant stakeholders in the educative process expression, action and choice in the marketplace’ where they and there is little scope for their advanced status in classroom are ‘activated, responsibilised, individualised, moralised , and/or relations and schooling decision making. A robust conception freed’ (Miller, 2015, p. 350). The student as ‘autonomous agent’ of agency prompts us to move beyond low-level individualistic is a commodified conception of personhood where individuals conceptions of ‘managing self ’ to the recognition that learners ‘realise fulfilment brought about by continual monitoring and develop identities in relation to the material, temporal, relational

The answer for school financial management =

expanding the solutions – NZ school financial reporting

• Online 24/7 access • Streamline your financial systems • Simple to use for faster data entry, reconciliation, invoices and payments and invoices • Straightforward transition to Xero from other accounting software and systems • Monty provides easy budgeting, governance and management reporting • Email reports directly to budget holders • Set up & support from experienced education providers

=

• Easiest integration from student finances to Xero • Powerful analysis tools Capture the power of mobile access

www.solutionsandservices.co.nz

and spatial dimensions of classrooms. Possibilities for democratic About the Authors participatory pedagogy and agency may be reduced to rhetoric if Dr Jennifer Charteris is a teacher educator with teaching experience the focus on students as sovereign selves remains a primary focus. in New Zealand, Australia and the UK. She has worked with students, It is timely to consider approaches to agency, with the teachers, principals, school communities and school in-service advisors prominence it has in our current parlance. In writing this piece, across the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors. Her doctoral research we recommend an expanded consideration of agency that was in the area of learner agency. As an in-service teacher educator with the University of Waikato, Jennifer provided professional learning for recognises relational, ecological and new material dimensions. principals and teachers that aimed to raise This is in order to engage with a student achievement through targeted richer conception of pedagogy, We caution against a assessment for learning and culturally than one that focuses exclusively responsive pedagogies. She is currently on learner responsibilisation. The sovereign approach Senior Lecturer of School Pedagogy at the University of New England in Armidale various forms of agency position that places a focus on Australia. learners in different ways, and Ms Dianne Smardon is based in Hamilton influence approaches to teaching individual motivation and and undertakes contract work for the and learning. It is therefore important University of New England as a teacher unquestioned learner to understand the limitations of educator in Nauru. She led Assessment sovereign agency. responsibilisation. and Curriculum professional development We caution against a sovereign projects for teachers and school leaders in approach that places a focus on individual motivation and Aotearoa/New Zealand with the University of Waikato. She has worked unquestioned learner responsibilisation. These are ‘unsociological’ with school leaders and teachers as a consultant in Hong Kong. In and ‘de-politicised’ conceptions of learning (Istance & Kools, researching teacher education in Aotearoa/New Zealand and the Pacific, 2013, p. 48). We suggest that the typology illustrated here may she has contributed to a range of research teams. She has published support teachers and leaders to avoid simplistic notions of ‘choice research articles on school leadership and systemic improvement though and voice’ to make explicit the nuances of agency in classroom collaborative peer coaching practices. settings. Acknowledgement The authors wish to thank the Principals across New Zealand who contributed to this research. References Charteris, J., & Smardon D. (2017). A typology of agency in new generation learning environments: emerging relational, ecological and new material considerations. Pedagogy, Culture and Society. Available at http://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/ AsDXs66xAJGFXi7tQcA3/full Davies, B. 2000. A body of writing 1990–1999. Walnut Creek, CA: Rowman & Littlefield. Edwards, A. (2011). Building common knowledge at the boundaries between professional practices: Relational agency and relational expertise in systems of distributed expertise. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(1), 33–39. Istance, D., & Kools, M. (2013). OECD Work on Technology and Education: innovative learning environments as an integrating framework. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 43–57. DOI: 10.1111/ejed.12017 McPherson, A., & Saltmarsh, S. (2016). Bodies and affect in nontraditional learning spaces. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–10. DOI:10.1080/00131857.2016.1252904

Kids have fun and learn water safety

Miller, E. R. (2016). The ideology of learner agency and the neoliberal self. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 348–365. DOI: 10.1111/ijal.12129

Aquatic education, based on Water Skills For Life, is the most comprehensive and best way children can learn to stay safe in, on and around water.

Priestley, M., Edwards, R., Priestley, A., & Miller, K. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum making: Agents of change and spaces for manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 191–214.

Water safety and swimming skills, in combination, will result in fewer drownings.

watersafety.org.nz/forlife

SCHOOL WIDE INTERCOM & EMERGENCY PAGING SYSTEMS

We’ll design you an intercom and emergency announcement system for free – with no obligation.

WORRY NO MORE! We have the solution!

NEW!

Frustrated by your old PA System?

QUICK INSTALLATION

With 2N IP Audio, everything is connected by simply plugging in to an existing LAN port.

Remote support can be monitored and adjusted from the office or via remote over the internet.

New Zealand supported product.

Remote control is easy from any computer on the network or remote.

Easily schedule the school bell, adjust the volume & monitor speaker operation at the push of a button.

EASY OPERATION

2N IP microphone and a VoIP phone can be located anywhere in the school A

Page classrooms individually or in groups. One-way and two-way systems available.

CALL US TODAY FOR A FREE CONSULTATION! 0800 433927 (EXT 2) Distributed in NZ by Edwards Sound Systems Ltd., PO Box 12 834, Penrose, Auckland 1642, New Zealand 0800 433927 (EXT 2) sales@edwardsnz.co.nz www.edwardsnz.co.nz

Tools to support school leadership — and improve educational outcomes Chief Researcher at NZCER

The result is the Teaching and School Practices Survey that covers effective teaching practices, school practices and principal leadership, in a survey that takes teachers and principals around 10–15 minutes. Thanks to Ministry of Education support, use of the tool is free in Terms 2 and 3 each year. The principal leadership and school practices questions in the tool draw on four key strands of research, including collaborative leadership. ‘School principals sometimes feel pressure to be “heroic leaders”, but the research shows this model is not effective,’ Cathy Wylie said. Collaborative leadership enables continuous improvement and development and ensures that school leadership is sustainable. NZPF President Whetu Cormick encourages principals and

Dragon Maths Workbooks

E-ON BO RIT

wi

S OK

NZCER’s Educational Leadership Practices survey was available for school leaders from 2009 to 2016. This year NZCER has released a new tool, the Teaching and School Practices Survey tool. We wanted to know what has changed, and what the new tool can do for schools. Cathy Wylie, Chief Researcher at NZCER, has been involved in both tools. ‘We develop and update these tools because research consistently points to the difference leadership makes for educational outcomes,’ Cathy Wylie said. ‘School leadership is a large and complex role, and the administrative and organisational demands can make it challenging to maintain a focus on pedagogical leadership.’ The Educational Leadership Practices survey (ELP) was based on the Educational Leadership Best Evidence Synthesis1 and the vision for New Zealand educational leadership set out in Kiwi Leadership for Principals. ‘The Best Evidence Synthesis framed school leadership as leadership of an organisation that is continually learning and enquiring,’ Cathy Wylie said. She added that the adoption of the tool proved its value to school leaders. It was used in the Experienced Principals Development Programme, the FirstTime Principals programme, and by individual schools and some school clusters. ‘Principals who found the ELP survey valuable told us that they and their staff used the results to spark discussion of deeper aspects of pedagogy and how school processes could better support desired change,’ Cathy Wylie said. ‘It helped identify where to make the best use of that scarce resource, time. It was also really interesting for principals to see how their own view related to teachers’ views. The tool spurred self-evaluation and ongoing data-using inquiry cycles.’ In 2016 it was time for a refresh. Time pressures also meant schools needed a shorter survey, and they needed to get their results as soon as they were ready. Cathy Wylie looked for more recent research literature on effective school leadership to see what further insight had been gained since 2009. She also looked at leadership standards and surveys designed for formative purposes, and ERO’s Leadership for Equity and Excellence and Professional Capability and Collective Capacity domains in the School Evaluation Indicators. ‘There’s a much greater emphasis on inquiry and relationships for teachers, too’ Cathy Wylie said. If a new tool was to be developed, it had to give good information on key parts of effective teaching practices.’

SIGMA W

Cathy Wylie

t h a n s we r s

. . . fire up an appetite for Mathematics These best-selling workbooks include the following features : ◆ All curriculum strands covered ◆ Large size – 140 pages ◆ Four numeracy chapters ◆ 60+ pages of numeracy ◆ Topic instruction boxes ◆ Step-by-step examples ◆ New 3rd Editions from 2018 ◆ Removable answer pages ◆ Titles for Year 3 to Year 8 ◆ Samples books supplied

Discounts for for bulk bulk sales Discounts Buy direct direct and and save save Buy

0800 274 462 or go to our website at:

or go to our website at: www.sigmapublications.co.nz www.sigmapublications.co.nz

schools to participate. ‘The tool will give them valuable insights into their practice,’ he said. ‘Reflecting on the items will help you with your leadership and teaching practice.’ Whetu Cormick was part of the advisory group for the tool, representing NZ Principals’ Federation, along with representatives from NZ Educational Institute, NZ Association of Intermediate and Middle Schools, Post Primary Teachers’ Association, Secondary Principals’ Association of NZ, and NZ School Trustees Association. ‘I was delighted to be involved with the advisory group and found the developers open to suggestions,’ Whetu Cormick said. The advisory group also worked with the Education Review Office, the Education Council, and the Ministry of Education. ‘In terms of time-management,’ Whetu Cormick says, ‘the tool is well designed.’ ‘I’ve had anecdotal feedback from schools that have done the survey, and it’s not onerous. We always think “I haven’t got time”, but once they start, they’ll see how short the survey is.’ The developers were aware that time, choice, and privacy would affect perceptions of the tool. ‘We’ve developed and trialled this as a formative tool. For it to work as intended, teachers need to know it is not compulsory and that individual responses can’t be identified,’ Cathy Wylie said. ‘Individuals might want to print their responses for their own reflection or performance appraisal, but that is their decision.’ Want to find out more? Go to www.tspsurveys.org.nz

References 1 Robinson, V., Hohepa, M., & Lloyd, C. (2009). School Leadership and Student Outcomes: Identifying what works and why. Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration [BES]. Wellington: Ministry of Education. https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/ series/2515/60169/60170 About the Author Cathy Wylie works on a number of long-running research projects, including the national surveys of primary, intermediate, and secondary schools that started with Tomorrow’s Schools in 1989. She leads the longitudinal study, ‘Competent Children, Competent Learners’, which has tracked subjects from early childhood to early adulthood. Cathy’s 2012 book Vital Connections: Why we need more than self-managing schools argues for better support across the education system to improve student outcomes. She sees leadership as a key factor in improving outcomes. Cathy led the development of the Teaching and School Practices Survey tool.

distinction

Financial Reporting Education Services provides a Financial Reporting Service to over 660 New Zealand schools – we are the largest provider of accounting services to school’s in New Zealand – and would love the opportunity to help you. Take all the worry out of Financial Management (Including completing your Annual Financial Statements in the new reporting format with ease) and have everything done on time, every time and done right! We have an office and personnel near you: Whangarei, Auckland, Hamilton, Rotorua, New Plymouth, Whanganui and Wellington. If you would like a no obligation quote to compare the cost of our service to what you are currently receiving, or would like to enquire exactly what our service involves, please phone:

Pete on 06 757 5489 or email: pete@educationservices.co.nz www.educationservices.co.nz

Affordable healthy food in your school Here’s How: Contact fuelled4life@heartfoundation.org.nz or 09 571 4762 for a Free one-on-one nutrition consultation

www.fuelled4life.org.nz

Resene Discover

Specialists in Audio Visual Supply & Installation for Schools

p: 09 912 7222

Resene Bright Spark

Bring out the best in your school Save time and money with free Resene School Services. We have assisted thousands of schools with their painting and decorating projects. Let us help you with yours.

Resene Flourish

Classroom Interactive Learning Auditoriums & Theatres System Design and Equipment Microphones, Mixers, Processors, Amplifiers, Video/Data Projectors Infrastructure Wiring, Supplying Portable PAs User Training • Bayview School • Vauxhall School • Carmel College • Glenfield College • Freemans Bay School • Kristin School • Auckland Waterfront Theatre

To find out more visit: www.resene.co.nz/schoolservices

e: info@comsec.net.nz w: www.comsecav.co.nz

YOUR CLEANING SUPPLIES All cleaning equipment solutions Complete Rest room solutions Free Technical Advice Cleaning Chemicals Equipment servicing Test and Tag

TEAM

www.facebook.com/NZCLEAN / 0800 269 253 / 0800 2 NZCLEAN / www.cleaningsupplies.net.nz